Solicitor rebuked after failing to check fraudster client

The Law Gazette

30 September 2021

Clients feel a strong sense of control with portal access. Check out the whitepaper Improving Client Experience Through Technology to learn more about how you can empower clients through more effective communications without micromanaging every detail.

A decision notice published by the SRA explained the unnamed client had attended the offices of north east firm S J Palin & Co Solicitors without a prior appointment in April 2019. He explained to the firm’s sole practitioner Samuel Palin that he had borrowed £53,800 from his mother’s former partner (Mr B) and wanted to renovate and sell a property to repay the debt.

Palin advised him to prepare a declaration of trust to record the other person’s share of the property and to register it against the property with the Land Registry.
The solicitor checked the client’s passport but did not see evidence of his residence or evidence that he owned the property that the declaration of trust was to be registered against.

Palin wrote to Mr B enclosing a signed and unwitnessed version of the declaration of trust, but Mr B then phoned to say his own checks had shown that the client was not the owner of the property. Palin told him he had been assured the property purchase was complete and the discrepancy may have been because of a time lag in updating Land Registry records.

Mr B confirmed he was content for the declaration of trust to be submitted for registration and this was sent to the Land Registry. This was initially rejected, prompting Palin to contact the client, but he received no response and there was ultimately no evidence presented of his ownership of the property.

Relatives of Mr B reported that he had been a victim of fraud and had loaned additional money because he believed the declaration of trust safeguarded his interests. The matter was reported to Northumbria Police and the client was convicted of fraud and theft last September.

Palin admitted failing to conduct adequate client ID checks and failing to verify that his client owned the property related to the declaration of trust. The SRA stated his behaviour was reckless but noted that he took steps to safeguard Mr B’s position and made improvements in his client inception process. This was an isolated incident with a low risk of being repeated.

Palin was rebuked and ordered to pay £300 SRA costs.


For more information on how Advantage365 can help your law firm, please call us on 0121 212 6580 or request a free call-back using our contact form to get free initial advice. You can also access a wealth of free business information for lawyers by visiting our digital Resource Centre and view our free Business Factsheets .

Alternatively, please subscribe to our services here or book an online consultation here, or email us on